Need information on long term accomodation.
Hello everyone!
We are heading to Thailand in a few weeks for a 5 week period. We are trying to find some accomodation for this time. Our budget is roughy 30 000 THB for the time there. We have tried to look on some websites but everything seems to be a bit more expensive.
We're hoping to get some insight on places that could still be nice but yet affordable to suit our budget. It would be in the Phuket region, preferably near a nice beach (doesn't have to be really close to a beach but within walking distance).
Also, how much should we intend to spend on food per day?
Any must do activities/places to visit while there?
Any other suggestions is greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
Reply to this It's better to have hostel there. It will be cheap and best for you one such hostel is Phuket International Youth Hostel
Price range is between us $4-10
Locate around Chalong bay area in the southern part of Phuket Island, Easy to get around because it's on the main street, the local bus stop infront of the hostel.
Phuket Youth Hostel YHA is a member of TYHA (Thailand Youth Hostel Association), and TYHA is a member of IYHF (International Youth Hostel Federation)
Beaches such as Rawaii beach, Nai han beach, Kata & Karon beach, Promtep Cape are near to hostel.
Activities
Elephant Trekking
Bungy Jumping
Go Kart
ATV offroading
Horse Riding
Mini-golf
Muay Thai
Shooting Range
Bowling
Reply to this I had taken up my Bangkok Accommodation
at Khao San Road, well
.it is a maze of travel agents, hotels, guesthouses, restaurants, pubs, clubs
It's a world by itself. Reply to this In Phuket if you are going to be there for weeks look at get a condo! Sounds crazy but you can probbably find one really cheap. In Pattaya a cheap hotel will run you 500 baht a night with air con hot water, you can get a nice ocean view condos for as low as 7000 baht and you pay the electric and water. This time of year is a great time to get a good deal.
Phuket is one of the most expensive resort areas in Thailand
Reply to this