RIHLA#26

---

1.The article is essentially about garment workers have had their rights violated. Employers that owned the building thought that they can exceed the carrying capacity of the building; they failed, and the building came tumbling down.

2. Human rights were, most definitely, violated. The workers' lives were endangered, and they were not reimbursed if they were injured or killed. What people do to get more money is ridiculous. Instead of trying to do the impossible, they should have purchased a warehouse to house the technology.

3. I believe that the owners of the collapsed building should be fined for unsafe working conditions and with injured/dead people that was completely preventable. There should be much more done about this tragedy.

---