Welcome to the Travel Forums


Why join TravelBlog?

  • Membership is Free and Easy
  • Your travel questions answered in minutes!
  • Become part of the friendliest online travel community.
Join Now! Join TravelBlog* today and meet thousands of friendly travelers. Don't wait! Join today and make your adventures even more enjoyable.

* Blogging is not required to participate in the forums
Advertisement


3 weeks in West Coast America

Advertisement
Hi, I am planning a trip with my boyfriend to West Coast US around 3 weeks.
11 years ago, July 9th 2012 No: 1 Msg: #158595  
Hi, am planning a trip with my bf to west coast of America for 3 weeks. (expected in April/May 2013)
At the moment, have too many ideas but a bit messy.

Thinking of LA, San Fransisco, Grand Canyon and Yellow stone park.
Btw..we gonna fly from Amsterdam.

Haven't had any experience in US so far...So any of your suggestion is very much appreciated! Reply to this

11 years ago, July 9th 2012 No: 2 Msg: #158617  
Right now, am thinking the possilbe routings in 3 weeks

From amsterdam heading to LA, then driving towards to Las vegas, probably drop by death valley (not so sure about it due to the temperature), but will definitely go to Grand canyon.

Then fly to salt lake, rent a car heading for Yellowstone park, approx 6 days.

Then taking flight to San Fransisco, do some shopping, sight seeing etc.

Total is about 3weeks. Dont know if it is realistic?
Thanks in advance! Reply to this

11 years ago, July 9th 2012 No: 3 Msg: #158619  
It certainly sounds do-able in 3 weeks. The timing will depend on what you plan to do. Do you plan on doing lots of hiking and camping in the National Parks or are you interested in just a day-trip to see the main attractions?

Though I have to ask - if you're going to drive from L.A to Vegas and out to Grand Canyon, why not just continue driving up through Salt Lake into Yellowstone, rather than driving back to L.A and then flying?

It would certainly be cheaper to continue your car rental than it would be for two one-way plane tickets, and instead of spending your time in airports and car-hire lines, you'll get to spend it driving through some very scenic landscapes in southern Utah.

The U.S does not have very good public transportation, so you'll find that outside of the city-centers you'll need a car.

Reply to this

11 years ago, July 10th 2012 No: 4 Msg: #158640  
In response to: Msg #158619

Thank you very much!
Actually after my questions yesterday, my bf said the same, will be better just driving, keep driving from las vegas to salt lake then continuing to Yellowstone Park.

Flight AMS-LAX
Driving LAX-Las vegas, grand canyon, salt lake, then yellowstone (2 weeks total)
Then driving yellowstone to San fransisco and have a stay (1 week total)

Am thinking, if Death valley must go scenery? And, where shall i stop between yellowstone and san fransisco considering it is 17 hrs drive. would love to have a short stay somewhere but beautiful place.

Thank you!!!

[Edited: 2012 Jul 10 07:59 - gracebamboo:244433 ]
Reply to this

11 years ago, July 10th 2012 No: 5 Msg: #158647  
I do not consider Death Valley a "must go." If you're driving from L.A to Vegas, it is slightly out of the way - I would recommend you spend more time in Grand Canyon, Yellowstone, Vegas, etc. We had planned on spending several days there on our road-trip but we ended up spending just a few hours because the weather made it impossible to do much. Also, you have to have a four-wheel drive vehicle to get to the more interesting places, so depending on what type of car you rent, you might be able to access much.

I-80 across Nevada (the shortest distance from Yellowstone to San Francisco) is one of the least traveled interstates in the country. Sorry to say we've never been on that stretch of road so I can't tell you what's all there. Desert and sagebrush (which can be beautiful if you're not used to that sort of thing). The towns you'll come across will likely have a bit of "wild west/gold rush" feel to them.

Having been on numerous road-trips, I think a general plan is good, but a strictly structured plan takes the fun out of it. Have a "goal" of how far you'd like to get each day, but be flexible on the specifics. You never know what you might come across that lures you in for one reason or another! Reply to this

11 years ago, July 10th 2012 No: 6 Msg: #158650  

In response to: Msg #158647

Thank you for sharing your experience and great advice!
Have a good day! Reply to this

11 years ago, July 13th 2012 No: 7 Msg: #158759  

In response to: Msg #158595

Greetings and welcome to travelblog!

You will be able to see a lot of things in 3 weeks and yet it is not enough time for many. The itinerary you have outlined covers a lot of miles. As Stephanie says most of it is scenic.

As Stephanie said it would be helpful if you were to outline some of the activities you have in mind. Do you prefer mountains or beaches? You will have an opportunity to explore both but we can make more specific suggestions if we know the kind of activities you are looking for.

San Francisco is a great city to listen to music, see a play or go to a museum. You may want to rent bikes and ride across the Golden Gate Bridge. Exploring the wharf in San Francisco is touristy but fun. Ride a cable car and eat lots of great seafood. We recommend some hiking nearby on Angel Island or into Muir Woods. You will have the option of a short hike or a long hike and both locations are close to the city.

Sonoma and Napa Valley are less than one hour north of San Francisco so you may want to spend a day exploring wineries. Try to hit Lagunitas Brewery while you are in the neighborhood. If you would like a list of restaurant recommendations in the area please let us know.

A coastal drive is a must while you are in California. You can head north along the coast to Mendicino or south along the coast through 1 mile drive, Big Sur and all the way to LA. It is an amazing drive. You can stop along the way to see the elephant seals on the coast. Cute towns like Carmel, Monterey, Santa Cruz, San Simeon, San Luis Obispo, Pismo Beach and Santa Barbara warrant a few stops.

The drive from San Francisco to Yosemite is 4 hours. I recommend you spend 3 days if you want to do some hiking.

We've been living in the San Francisco area for the past 1 1/2 years and have written several blogs about the area. You may want to read a few of them for additional ideas.

People who have never been to California always imagine the entire state as warm. Hollywood leaves people with that impression. The San Francisco area can be cool in the spring. Bring a jacket.

You could easily spend a week or more in any of the locations you have in mind.

I would recommend 1 week in the SF area exploring the city and the coast. I would spend 3 nights in Yosemite. My personal opinion is that two nights in Las Vegas will be adequate. You can explore LA in 4 or 5 days.

If you have additional questions please ask.

Reply to this

11 years ago, July 13th 2012 No: 8 Msg: #158765  

In response to: Msg #158759

Thank you for your great suggestions.

San Fransisco for sure will be a must go place, and now I noticed 3 weeks actually is not long enough to cover LA/Grand Canyon/Yellow stone/San Fransisco all together...For me, Yellowstone is also a must. Yellowstone is a dream for me since I was a child, sitting in the class to learn geography in Shanghai, now I am ready to explore the area.Only thing is, I am struggling if I need to rent a 4X4 drive or a camper.

Luckily, I have plenty of time to prepare. Will go to Cote d'zur for 2 weeks relaxation at the end of Aug, probably will make a detailed travel schedule 😊

Starting loving this travel forum and blog, nice people and great advice! Thanks! Reply to this

11 years ago, July 24th 2012 No: 9 Msg: #159119  
B Posts: 2,064
Most of the roads in the western US are in very good shape. You will not need a 4X4 unless you are planning on visiting out of the way places along dirt roads. In this case, be sure to check the rental insurance, because most do not cover damage from driving on dirt roads. I damaged my car on a dirt road once, and it cost over a thousand dollars to fix.

Some people like RVs because they can camp in campgrounds and save on costs. Also, you can cook your own food every night. The downside is that they are tricky to handle on mountain roads, and consume gas like nothing else. You can certainly see wilderness areas without one. I used a tent on my road trip.

Yellowstone requires at least three days to see everything, but can easily take twice that (I spent an entire day just watching geysers on my first visit). Also keep in mind that during the busy season you will need reservations a year in advance to stay in the park overnight.

If you absolutely must have Yellowstone and San Francisco, make these the end points of the trip and pick things in between. Plan on flying to Salt Lake City for this to work. Grand Teton (less than an hour from Yellowstone), Salt Lake City itself, Lake Tahoe, and Yosemite come to mind as great spots. The Pacific Coast Highway, as noted above, is one of the world's great scenic drives (look at the blogs under 'Big Sur' and see it). Reno is worth a few hours if you want to gamble.
[Edited: 2012 Jul 24 05:08 - Roosta:95057 ]
Reply to this

11 years ago, April 1st 2013 No: 10 Msg: #168322  
Hi, now have decided to skip yellowstone but more focus on california and a bit further to Arches. Starting from SFO, driving camper down towards LA, then grand canyon, monument valley, Arches, capital reef, Bryce Canyon,zion, las vegas, death valley, monolake, yosemite, then back to SFO.

We plan to stay at LA for two nights, am wondering where is the best camping to park our camper, can also easily get out to the city.

And if I stay at Las vegas for two nights, will it be wise to stay at hotel while parking the RV under the garage?

Reply to this

11 years ago, April 1st 2013 No: 11 Msg: #168329  
B Posts: 2,064
LA is a giant urban area, so it has few camping spots. The state parks in Orange County and in the Santa Monica Mountains are closest to the main tourist sites. I haven't tried any of them personally (I've always stayed in hotels).

Las Vegas has a campground only a block from the strip, the KOA behind Circus Circus at the northern end. Its basically a giant tar parking lot with no atmosphere whatsoever. If your camper will fit, you can certainly park it at a hotel. Find out how high the vehicle is, call the hotels you are thinking about, and ask. You can also park at one of the smaller casinos with open air lots, but they tend to be in sketchier areas.
Reply to this

11 years ago, April 4th 2013 No: 12 Msg: #168522  

In response to: Msg #168329
Thanks for your advice.

And, I have planed my routing like flwg, though some friends have advised me driving 4400km within 3 weeks is not wise to do..but still, want to get some professional suggestions from this forum

D1,2 SFO
D3, Carmel/Monterey
D4,Santa Barbara
D5+6, Hollywood, Los Angeles
D7,Lake Havasu
D8+9, Grand Canyon
D10,Page
D11,Monument Valley
D12+13, Arches
D14,Bryce Canyon
D15, Zion
D16+17, Las vegas
D18,Barstow (just a stop)
D19,Sequoia
D20+21,Yosimite
D22, SFO
D23, Flight back to AMS

I am now stuggling if it is workable, and if I need to drop Arches to make it more relaxed..so any opinion, will be appreciated!

Thanks a million😊😊😊 Reply to this

11 years ago, April 4th 2013 No: 13 Msg: #168535  
Your itinerary is workable, provided you are up for an average for 3-5 hours a driving each day (during the later half of the trip). Driving 4400km in three weeks isn't for everyone but we've done it more than a time or two so it isn't impossible either.

Aside from your multi-day segments, you'll get around half a day in the major parks. If what you envision is arriving, locating the main landmarks and finding the best sight-seeing locations, taking in the view, grabbing a bite to eat (maybe a picnic somewhere), a short walk around the area (1-4 miles, depending on your pace) and then settling in to sleep amidst the beauty of the Americas (because you'll definitely need sleep with this itinerary) - you'll be fine.

Provided you have those realistic expectations, you should have a wonderful trip. Your itinerary will keep you on the go, but you'll be able to adjust mid-way to suit your style (ie: you might not want to spend the whole day at Monument Valley, and may just drive on through to Arches. Or, alternatively, you might have gotten your fill of desert by Bryce Canyon and decide to spend allot more time among the trees in the Sequoias).

Either way - it's a good "scaffold" and since you have a camper, you're not committing yourself to any set rigid dates, apart from the airport. But on the off-chance you find that it is rushed, I would decide *ahead of time* what are each of your absolutely, cannot, will-not miss it sites are. It wards off mid-trip disagreements if it has been well established what you will not compromise on. 😊 Inevitably you'll discover other places en-route that would be impossible to plan ahead for, and it will divert your time (in the most pleasant way)




Reply to this

11 years ago, April 4th 2013 No: 14 Msg: #168537  
Hello Gracebamboo -- your trip is just around the corner!
I'll bet you are counting the days.

We agree with all that Stephanie has said.

The problem with planning a trip like this is there never seems to be enough time to do all that you want to do. As you mention, you are wondering if this itinerary is too aggressive and if you should drop Arches so it is more relaxed.

It looks like you've given this a lot of thought and planning. It is so exciting.

Our recommendation is that you make some adjustments but you'll have to decide which ones. When people come to the United States they are always surprised the distance from one location to another. In the above plan you have not included much time for travel to each location.

In our opinion San Francisco is one of the more amazing cities of the world and two days does not seem enough. Please remember you will have jet lag or first couple of days.
That does not give you much time to walk across the Golden Gate bridge, rent bicycles to ride down by the bay, walk the wharf, eat a sundae at Ghiradelli chocolate, ride the cable cars (and stand in the line), explore China town, explore North Bay, see a play or attend a comedy club. Take a ride over to Tiburon or Sausalito. A hike in the nearby Muir woods to see the great redwoods. I'm not sure if you were planning to explore Alcatraz or Angel Islands? Taking a Duck tour or the Hop on Hop off bus may allow you to see some of this quicker (not sure) but it certainly will keep you busy.

Let's assume you are going gangbusters and are functioning on 12-14 hour days.

Near Monterey and Carmel-

Don't miss the 17 mile drive! An extraordinary drive.
If you enjoy aquariums- Monterey has one of the better ones.

If you have any extra money and want a splurge I recommend the helicopter ride over the Grand Canyon.

As Stephanie stated you'll be able to adjust your plan as you arrive in locations that you fall in love with and decide to stay a bit longer. I believe you said Yosemite was a must see for you. If so you may want to do it first or earlier in the trip. We always try to see my must do experiences early in the trip rather than toward the end in case something unforeseen happens.

We are eager to read your blogs and hear your impressions.



Reply to this

11 years ago, April 5th 2013 No: 15 Msg: #168552  
B Posts: 2,064
I can attest to what the people above mentioned through personal experience. When I started doing long roadtrips, I wanted to cram in as many sights as possible, constantly moving from one thing to another. I ultimately felt I spent too little time in each place to truly experience it, and was always exhausted. Once I learned to slow down and see less stuff, I enjoyed my trips much more.

To pick one example: many people see Bryce Canyon in a few hours. This is enough time to drive to several overlooks, get the iconic pictures friends will swoon over, and head on to the next destination. Taking an entire day, on the other hand, gives time to hike one the many trails below the rim, between the hoodoos, which is a completely different experience. They look much larger and even stranger close up, and the silence is unbelievable. On the other hand, if you like moving all the time, this type of experience would probably drive you insane. I took the entire day, and the hikes, on my visit.

Some specifics:
San Francisco and Los Angeles will absorb as much time as you have to give. I agree with D MJ Brinkley on making time to see the redwoods; they are incredible. People tend to overlook the Coit Tower, but on a fog free day the view of San Francisco and the bay is well worth it. For theme park fans, Disneyland is almost a must-see (and if you like intense roller coasters head for Magic Mountain, which has some of the best in the world!)

I'm not that big a fan of 17 Mile Drive, mostly due to that obnoxious toll. The coastal drive in Pacific Grove has similiar views for free. The other option is to spend extra time in Big Sur rather than rushing through in one day. The area has some great state parks with camping spots.

Lake Havasu City isn't really a tourist destination, unless you really need to see Old London Bridge (which is not worth the hype, to be honest). I would save the few hours to get more time in the Grand Canyon.

The current schedule gives only a few hours in Seqoia National Park. The roads to and in the park are steep, curvy, and slow; and in a camper they will be even slower. I would consider skipping the park in favor of Mariaposia Grove in Yosemite; its just as famous, although the trails tend to be more crowded. Depending on your condition after Las Vegas, it may be possible to stop somewhere further north than Barstow, giving more time in Yosemite.

The trip overall sounds wonderful; looking forward to your blogs. Reply to this

11 years ago, April 5th 2013 No: 16 Msg: #168554  

In response to: Msg #168552


I agree that the fee for the 17 mile drive is pricey ...but it is lovely.
If you were heading north I'd tell you the drive from SF to Mendocino is prettier but you are heading south. I like Ezra's suggestion.

Have a great trip.

Reply to this

11 years ago, April 5th 2013 No: 17 Msg: #168571  

In response to: Msg #168535
Hi Stephanie and Andras

It is nice to know that someone also did 4400km within 3 weeks, and even more than once, which gives me quite confidence😊
I used to like plan everything, fix everything before departure as otherwise I get nervous or even panic, but for this trip, I only booked hotel at SFO, ok, plus the 2 nights rv park in Grand canyon and 1night Yosimite (in the park) but THAT'S IT....I am going to take your advice, leave ourselves some open options 😊

My boyfriend and I are not that "professional" travellers, we live in Netherlands, and the most easy way for us to have a vacation is, rent a small cottage or mobile home somewhere in south France, Cote' d'zur, or hang out several days in Nice. So, this California trip is quite something for us, very symbolic...can't say it will change our life style, but it is our first step to see the real beautiful part of the world 😊

Thank you so much! Reply to this

11 years ago, April 5th 2013 No: 18 Msg: #168572  

In response to: Msg #168537
In response to: Msg #168537

Hi Dave and Merry

I've read some of your blog, which is lots of helpful information and, I must say, I like the slogan you quoted
"Life is very short, try everything you've dreamed about (within the perimeters of sanity and the law) and regret nothing. Oh, and don't forget the sunscreen." ~Amber Benson"

Yeah, you two live so closeby SFO, so I will definitely consider your suggestions. In my mind, SFO is famous for lots of things, fishman wharf, Alcatraz and China town...(I come from Shanghai), so everything is so so so exciting for us.

I've heard about 17miles drive before, I haven't checked routing carefully yet, but we plan to drive on the highway Nr.1 and stay a while around Big Sur area, don't know if it has covered 17miles drive or? But I will check later.

In my current plan, we will stay at Grand Canyon for 2 days, (at least), so will book a helicopter when we are there as I heard from a friend, he booked a helicopter in advance and that was a foggy day..bah..

I can't wait for my trip, and everyday, I try to keep diary to start blog here, haha...so exciting!

Reply to this

11 years ago, April 5th 2013 No: 19 Msg: #168573  

In response to: Msg #168552

Hi Ezra

Thank you for the reply.
Lake havasu isn't a must to go place on our itinery, but we are driving from Los angeles, heading to Grand Canyon, then it seems Havasu is on the routing, otherwise will be a very long day drive.

But if I gonna stay extra day around big sur area, then i might drop havasu later 😊

I just googled Redwoods, very special, if time allows, then going to there one night before to return the camper.

We arrive on 25APR, SFO, going to get camper on 27th, and return the camper on 16May early morning, can have at least half day to ride a bike go golden gate bridge. 17May we gonna fly back to AMS...At the beginning we thought 3 weeks is quite a time, now already starts wondering why it isn't 4 weeks.

I love all of your advice, thank you! Reply to this

11 years ago, April 5th 2013 No: 20 Msg: #168622  
B Posts: 2,064

In response to: Msg #168573
Regarding Havasu (and Barstow), the way I handle overnight stops on my roadtrips is to drive until I eat dinner, then find somewhere futher along with motels, and stop. Since you'll only need a camping spot, finding stopping points should be easier than with motels. Don't sleep in highway rest areas, they are often dodgy overnight. A laptop/netbook helps greatly with searching for last minute accomodation thanks to free wifi at fast food places, coffeehouses, and the like.

I also used to need everthing booked in advance. The first time I went somewhere without reservations was quite frightening, and took at least a week to get used to. Now I only reserve when I need to. Reply to this

Tot: 0.076s; Tpl: 0.01s; cc: 6; qc: 10; dbt: 0.0126s; 1; m:domysql w:travelblog (10.17.0.13); sld: 1; ; mem: 1mb