What an interesting topic!
Philosophers sometimes talk about cultural relativism - that you should only judge a culture within the values of that culture. Of course, the problem with this point of view is that it proposes that everybody should follow cultural relativism - that is, everybody should follow cultural relativism, regardless of the culture they come from 😉
I think that you can say something in a culture is right or wrong without being prejudiced, but you should be tentative about pointing out which parts. The main reason for this is that sometimes a person can think a cultural practice is wrong, simply because you don't understand it. I've seen some foreigners working in China do this - they think their concerns over work issues aren't heard by management. They think that they should only raise an issue once, and then it should be dealt with immediately, possibly after a debate about the issue.
The Chinese management don't work like this (those I work with anyway). The best way to get action on an issue is to raise it respectfully, ask for a suggestion as to how management and the teacher could approach the problem, and then let it percolate in their heads. They appreciate a non-confrontational style and being given time to think about issues, which is quite different to the west I think. This might have something to do with talking to the Chinese managers in their second language as well - though they are just as intelligent as us Western workers, (and sometimes more capable) they're at a serious disadvantage in a heated debate.
When foreign workers don't appreciate the different decision making style (and speed), they think that they are getting shafted and make regrettable statements about the people and the culture.
I should point out also that I think some of the recent controversy and condemnation of China is ill-advised and prejudiced. Imagine you were a government that had opened up it's borders 30 years ago, had made consistent gains in your own peoples' standard of living and human rights, and then the media if a number of countries condemn you and embarrass you on the world stage? Which (metaphorical) finger would you use to express yourself to the people who choose to focus only on the things you've done poorly?
For those who doubt human rights gains have been made, you have to consider the increasing liberalization of government policy since the cultural revolution.
Which country is perfect anyway? If we look at the self-styled leaders of the free world, we might remember Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib, Iraq, Vietnam and the rendition program.
So to get back to the topic, I think travel has broadened my mind - I would not have written this post a year ago - but not all of the judgments (good and bad) that I make about a culture should be considered prejudices.
Reply to this 
