Welcome to the Travel Forums


Why join TravelBlog?

  • Membership is Free and Easy
  • Your travel questions answered in minutes!
  • Become part of the friendliest online travel community.
Join Now! Join TravelBlog* today and meet thousands of friendly travelers. Don't wait! Join today and make your adventures even more enjoyable.

* Blogging is not required to participate in the forums
Advertisement


More interesting: Tikal or Antigua?

Advertisement
Traveling to Guatemala for 3 days. Is it better to stick to the north (Tikal and surrounding areas) or south (Antigua/Lake Atitlan)?
15 years ago, May 7th 2008 No: 1 Msg: #34556  
B Posts: 15
hi,

i'm headed to Guatemala for a short 3-day excursion. due to the length of the trip, i don't think i can backpack all throughout Guatemala. i'm interested in checking out the north: Tikal, Agua Caliente, Livingston and/or Rio Dulce. then again, i've heard that Antigua, Lake Atitlan and the Pacaya Volcano in the south were also a "must see". i'm short on time and really want to enjoy the trip. any suggestions?

thanks,
MMG Reply to this

15 years ago, May 10th 2008 No: 2 Msg: #34820  
B Posts: 128
If you've only got three days, I would recommend Antigua and Lake Atitlan. Tikal is really amazing and well worth a visit, but to get from there to Rio Dulce / Livingston is a quite a long bus trip (4/5 hours from memoy). Plus you will fly into Guat. City which is only about 40mins from Antigua, and to get to Tikal you'll need another flight (or take a day out for the bus trip), so in the short time you have I think you can experience more in Antigua / Atitlan. In Antigua there is lots to see, and the distance to Atitlan is not as far. And then go back and visit Tikal and more, because Guatemala is wonderful! Reply to this

15 years ago, June 25th 2008 No: 3 Msg: #39895  
B Posts: 15
Thanks for your advice! Reply to this

Tot: 0.02s; Tpl: 0.004s; cc: 5; qc: 10; dbt: 0.0085s; 1; m:domysql w:travelblog (10.17.0.13); sld: 1; ; mem: 955.2kb