Welcome to the Travel Forums


Why join TravelBlog?

  • Membership is Free and Easy
  • Your travel questions answered in minutes!
  • Become part of the friendliest online travel community.
Join Now! Join TravelBlog* today and meet thousands of friendly travelers. Don't wait! Join today and make your adventures even more enjoyable.

* Blogging is not required to participate in the forums
Advertisement


Study finds inherent bias on review sites

Advertisement
Many travelers use review sites to pick accomodations, transport and so forth. A new study has found an inherent bias in reviews due to a herd effect
10 years ago, August 9th 2013 No: 1 Msg: #173871  
B Posts: 2,064
Many travelers now use review sites on the web to pick accodations, transport, and so forth when planning trips. They have caused a lot of discussion over the years, for example: Is Trip Advisor paying for bad reviews?

A study of a news review site released today by MIT found a herd effect among reviewers leading to inflated positive reviews. Basically, people tend to rate positively items that are already positively rated. The Guardian has a story on it:
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/aug/08/snowball-effect-skews-rating-systems

What effect, if any, will this have on such sites, and Travelbloggers use of them? Reply to this

10 years ago, August 13th 2013 No: 2 Msg: #174032  
I guess that is true as i do look at the top 10 or so of accomodation in a city on different sites, so even me just reviewing them myself is a bias as i have already filtered what i'm looking at.

I think we just have to look for constructive information in reviews and try to ignore any that are positive or negative and i guess from the above, be aware that there might be perfectly reasonable and fantastic accomodation further down the lists regardless of the number or types of reviews it has received 😊 Reply to this

Tot: 0.023s; Tpl: 0.004s; cc: 5; qc: 7; dbt: 0.0069s; 1; m:domysql w:travelblog (10.17.0.13); sld: 1; ; mem: 940.6kb