Welcome to the Travel Forums

Why join TravelBlog?
  • Membership is Free and Easy
  • Your travel questions answered in minutes!
  • Become part of the friendliest online travel community.
Join Now!Join TravelBlog* today and meet thousands of friendly travelers. Don't wait! Join today and make your adventures even more enjoyable.

* Blogging is not required to participate in the forums
Advertisement


''Is Buckingham Palace ugly?''

Advertisement
''Buckingham Palace will be a focal point in the Queen's Jubilee celebrations, 250 years after work started to make it into a royal residence. But is this famous landmark an attractive building or a carbuncle, asks Sophie Robehmed.''



53 weeks ago, May 14th 2012Delete | Edit No: 1 Msg: #156194  
B Posts: 24.6K
Quotes from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18056612

I used to walk past Buckingham Palace often, when I lived in London. It never occurred to me to ask if it deserves to have all those tourists having their photos taken with it or not. It didnt seem to be strikingly ugly, or i'd surely have given that a thought. :)

What do you think?






[Edited: 2012 May 14 14:32 - Mell:49612 ]

[Edited: 2012 May 14 15:31 - Mell:49612 ]
Reply to this

51 weeks ago, June 1st 2012Delete | Edit No: 2 Msg: #157043  
B Posts: 5,084
I think it is rather stately looking. Reply to this

51 weeks ago, June 1st 2012Delete | Edit No: 3 Msg: #157053  
N Posts: 7
The only touch of colour is the soldier.. who is the "star" of Buckingam Palace. I think this is the reason why all tourists (including me!) who go to London take a picture of the soldier instead of the gloomy palace.. Reply to this




Tot: 0.085s; Tpl: 0.004s; cc: 13; qc: 24; dbt: 0.013s; 1; s:apollo w:www (50.28.60.10); sld: 2; ; mem: 6.1mb